{"id":61199,"date":"2022-01-20T15:20:35","date_gmt":"2022-01-20T14:20:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.clickworker.com\/?p=61199"},"modified":"2022-12-09T12:36:26","modified_gmt":"2022-12-09T11:36:26","slug":"seo-keywords-dead-or-alive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.clickworker.com\/customer-blog\/seo-keywords-dead-or-alive\/","title":{"rendered":"SEO keywords: dead or alive?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Keywords<\/p>\r\n\r\n

Content, search intent, user experience, differentiated user signals, and artificial intelligence (AI) \u2014 Google’s ranking criteria are becoming increasingly complex. So where does that leave keywords? Have the keywords in the text outlived their usefulness as ranking factors? The relevance of keywords for search engine optimization has changed. Online copywriters<\/a> are now facing new challenges.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

A look into the past<\/h2>\r\n

Some of you will remember those splendid SEO times at the turn of the millennium. Back then, simply mentioning the main keyword as often as possible in the text was enough to achieve the highest positions in the search engines for precisely that keyword. It hardly mattered how well the content matched the topic. And then there was the legendary “keywords” meta tag. Depending on his mood, the webmaster was able to insert the keywords for which he wanted to rank. And that actually worked.<\/p>\r\n

The algorithms of the leading search engines at the time (Google, Yahoo, Lycos, Altavista) were relatively straightforward. Using comparatively simple calculation methods, the crawlers of the search engine pioneers tried to track down the relevance of texts. The main factor here was keyword density<\/a>. As a rule of thumb, the frequency of keywords in a text is an indicator of relevance.<\/p>\r\n

But those days are long gone. The more keywords, the higher the website’s rankings? That is yesterday’s news. Things are quite different today: <\/p>\r\n