{"id":61199,"date":"2022-01-20T15:20:35","date_gmt":"2022-01-20T14:20:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.clickworker.com\/?p=61199"},"modified":"2022-12-09T12:36:26","modified_gmt":"2022-12-09T11:36:26","slug":"seo-keywords-dead-or-alive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.clickworker.com\/customer-blog\/seo-keywords-dead-or-alive\/","title":{"rendered":"SEO keywords: dead or alive?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\r\n\r\n
Content, search intent, user experience, differentiated user signals, and artificial intelligence (AI) \u2014 Google’s ranking criteria are becoming increasingly complex. So where does that leave keywords? Have the keywords in the text outlived their usefulness as ranking factors? The relevance of keywords for search engine optimization has changed. Online copywriters<\/a> are now facing new challenges.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n Some of you will remember those splendid SEO times at the turn of the millennium. Back then, simply mentioning the main keyword as often as possible in the text was enough to achieve the highest positions in the search engines for precisely that keyword. It hardly mattered how well the content matched the topic. And then there was the legendary “keywords” meta tag. Depending on his mood, the webmaster was able to insert the keywords for which he wanted to rank. And that actually worked.<\/p>\r\n The algorithms of the leading search engines at the time (Google, Yahoo, Lycos, Altavista) were relatively straightforward. Using comparatively simple calculation methods, the crawlers of the search engine pioneers tried to track down the relevance of texts. The main factor here was keyword density<\/a>. As a rule of thumb, the frequency of keywords in a text is an indicator of relevance.<\/p>\r\n But those days are long gone. The more keywords, the higher the website’s rankings? That is yesterday’s news. Things are quite different today: <\/p>\r\n Three decades of Internet have also brought about many changes in the field of SEO. Keywords alone are no longer enough. But does that mean that they are dead? What are the top current ranking factors on Google?<\/p>\r\n Current optimization of search results focuses on the users. In the process, the relevance of keywords is fading more and more into the background. The latest algorithms of Google, Bing and Co., which are based on user orientation, are extremely successful. It is becoming easier than ever for searchers to find exactly the results they want.<\/p>\r\n Google relies on artificial intelligence, which essentially functions without keywords. The focus is on individual and collective surfing behavior, because it produces increasingly accurate results and optimizes the search results:<\/p>\r\n The “content is king” principle still applies to SEO. Good content is the basis for good positions on the SERPs. The intelligent search algorithms aim to track down valuable content and assign it to specific search intentions.<\/p>\r\n SEO experts should therefore pay particular attention to users and optimize content to meet their needs. Google tries to compensate inferior machine readability of the content of images and videos with a better analysis of the functionality and functioning of web pages.<\/p>\r\n Today, SEO no longer works with keywords, synonyms, and significant accompanying words alone. The needs of the user are the focal point of SEO.<\/p>\r\n However, none of this should obscure the fact that words are carriers of meaning. And this is why, even in the distant future, machines will have to rely on keyword analysis to capture the meaning of content — and thus its relevance for the user. Google will not be able to dispense with text analysis in the long term.<\/p>\r\n Therefore, the idea of WDF*IDF can still be very helpful for web copywriters. This formula calculates which words appear frequently in the proximity of a keyword.<\/p>\r\n A simple example: How can an engine recognize the meaning of the keyword “ruler” in a text?<\/p>\r\n In the early 2010s, a lot of SEO hype was generated around WDF*IDF. It was assumed that with the help of precise lists, one would be able to convince the search engines of the relevance of a text through a very specific distribution of terms. This was only moderately successful. However, this method remains an important aid for capturing each topic as holistically as possible. Content creators who check WDF*IDF lists for a keyword before writing a text do not run the risk of forgetting an important aspect.<\/p>\r\n\r\nA look into the past<\/h2>\r\n
\r\n
Important ranking factors today<\/h2>\r\n
\r\n
Keywords are still important<\/h2>\r\n
\r\n